Abstract

This chapter offers a comparison of the real options valuation approach, using the contingent claims approach, to two traditional valuation methods. The first traditional valuation approach discussed in this chapter is the NPV analysis, which also includes the contingent claims approach and the second is the decision tree analysis. Through this comparative study, it is shown when real options provide better results than traditional approaches. This will be illustrated on the basis of Copeland and Antikarov (2001) and these examples are further elaborated by the use of other literature.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call