Abstract
We have compared the laboratory performance of immunoradiometric (IRMA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods developed in this laboratory for measurement of serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). The IRMA utilizes a radiolabelled mouse monoclonal anti-PAP and a solid phased rabbit polyclonal anti-PAP. The same rabbit antibody is used in the RIA. The IRMA shows excellent precision over a much wider working range (0.25–1000 μg/l) than the RIA (0.73–14.0 /gmg/l), and can be completed in 5 h, while the RIA requires 3 days. Levels in healthy males and in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy are similar in both assays, upper limits of normal being 1.8 μg/l (IRMA) and 4.7 μg/l (RIA). The two assay methods correlate very well ( r = 0.97) when PAP is measured in serum from prostatic cancer patients, although IRMA results are generally lower than those obtained by RIA. About 20% of patients with non-metastatic prostatic carcinoma had elevated serum PAP, whereas about 80% of those with metastatic disease had raised levels. The diagnostic efficiencies of the RIA and IRMA appeared similar. The value of the IRMA in follow-up and staging remains to be determined.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
