Comparison of radiation dose, contrast enhancement and image quality of prospective ECG-Gated CT coronary angiography: Single versus dual source CT

Abstract

IntroductionThe updated National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines of 2017 state that new generation cardiac CT scanners (Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT, Discovery CT750 HD and Somatom Definition Flash) are recommended as an option for first-line imaging of the coronary arteries in people with suspected stable coronary artery disease (with an estimated likelihood of coronary artery disease of 10–29%) in whom imaging with earlier generation CT scanners is difficult. New generation cardiac CT scanners are also recommended as an option for first-line evaluation of disease progression, to establish need for revascularisation in people with known coronary artery disease in whom imaging with earlier generation CT scanners is difficult. CT scanning might not be necessary in situations in which immediate revascularisation is being considered. The European Society of Cardiology 2019 clinical practice guidelines recommend non-invasive functional imaging for myocardial ischaemia or coronary CT angiography (CTA) as the initial test to diagnose CAD in symptomatic patients in whom obstructive CAD cannot be excluded by clinical assessment alone. Given increased computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) utilisation, radiation dose, contrast enhancement and image quality of prospective ECG-gated CTCA between 256-slice single-source and 192x2-slice dual-source CT scanners were retrospectively evaluated. MethodsProspectively gated CTCA data from 63 patients on a 256-slice CT (group A) and 71 patients on a 192x2-slice dual source CT (group B) from January to December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated respectively. Scanner-reported dose length product values were used with a conversion factor (k = 0.014 mSv/mGy x cm) to estimate effective dose. Contrast enhancement was assessed with mean CT attenuation at selected regions of interest on axial coronary images. Image quality of the coronary arteries was assessed by a 4-point grading score (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = excellent image quality). ResultsThe radiation doses in group B were significantly lower than group A (3.68 + 2.13 mSv versus 4.81 + 1.56 mSv, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in contrast enhancement in the left coronary artery, proximal right coronary artery and left ventricular wall for both groups. Vessel image quality scores for group B were higher than group A (right coronary artery (RCA): 3.2 + 0.7 versus 2.4 + 0.7, p < 0.001; left anterior descending (LAD) artery: 3.0 + 0.8 vs 2.5 + 0.6, p < 0.001; left circumflex (LCx) artery: 3.3 + 0.7 vs 2.6 + 0.6, p < 0.001). Coronary artery contour scores for group B were significantly higher than group A (RCA: 3.2 + 0.8 versus 2.3 + 0.7, p < 0.001; LAD: 3.0 + 0.7 versus 2.4 + 0.6, p < 0.001; LCx: 3.3 + 0.6 versus 2.5 + 0.6, p < 0.001). ConclusionProspective ECG-gated CTCA performed on 192x2-slice CT results in better image quality and lower radiation dose than 256-slice CT. There were no significant differences in contrast enhancement in left main coronary artery (LMCA), proximal RCA and left ventricular wall in both groups. Implications for practiceIn institutions with both 256-slice and 192x2-slice CT scanners, we recommend that CTCAs be preferentially performed using the 192x2-slice CT scanner.