Abstract

Although high thromboembolic risk was assumed in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), inadequate control of prothrombin time/international normalized ratio was often observed in patients using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We hypothesized that patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) would have a better outcome than those treated with VKAs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of DOACs and VKAs in elderly patients with HF and AF. We retrospectively analyzed data from a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study. A total of 1036 patients who were hospitalized for acute decompensated HF were enrolled. We assessed 329 patients aged > 65 years who had non-valvular AF and divided them into 2 groups according to the anticoagulant therapy they received. A subgroup analysis was performed using renal dysfunction based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were non-cardiovascular death or stroke. The median follow-up period was 730 days (range 334–1194 days). The primary outcome was observed in 84 patients; non-cardiovascular death, in 25 patients; and stroke, in 14 patients. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DOAC group than in the VKA group (log-rank p = 0.033), whereas the incidence rates of non-cardiovascular death (log-rank p = 0.171) and stroke (log-rank p = 0.703) were not significantly different in the crude population. DOAC therapy was not associated with lower mortality in the crude population (log-rank p = 0.146) and in the eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup (log-rank p = 0.580). However, DOAC therapy was independently associated with lower mortality after adjustments for age, diabetes mellitus, and albumin level (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.99; p = 0.045) in the eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup. Compared with VKA therapy, DOAC therapy was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in the elderly HF patients with AF and renal dysfunction.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common form of cardiac arrhythmia in elderly patients

  • Previous studies revealed that use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) as compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was associated with lower risks of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding [7, 8], but the efficacy of DOACs in patients with renal dysfunction has not been fully discussed

  • Diabetes mellitus was more frequently observed in the VKA group, but history of stroke was more prevalent in the DOAC group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common form of cardiac arrhythmia in elderly patients. heart failure (HF) or renal dysfunction frequently coexists with AF [1], and high thromboembolic risk was assumed in elderly patients with HF and AF [2]. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard therapeutic agents for patients with AF for decades, and a previous study reported that VKA reduced stroke risk by 64% and mortality by 26% as compared with placebo [3]. A subanalysis of data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial reported that renal dysfunction was associated with a lower TTR of VKA during the administration period [5]. Previous studies revealed that use of DOACs as compared with VKAs was associated with lower risks of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding [7, 8], but the efficacy of DOACs in patients with renal dysfunction has not been fully discussed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DOACs in HF patients with AF and renal dysfunction in the Japanese population

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call