Comparison of presumed cardiac and respiratory causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract

Aims of the studyMost interventional and observational studies include cardiac arrest from cardiac origin. However, an increasing proportion of cardiac arrest results from an extra-cardiac origin, mainly respiratory. The aim of our study was to compare the characteristics and outcome of cardiac arrest patients according to the presumed cardiac or respiratory causes. MethodsThis retrospective multicenter observational study included out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients from presumed cardiac and respiratory origin treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Demographic data (age, sex, initial rhythm as shockable or non-shockable, durations of no-flow and low-flow), clinical evolution in ICU, lactate and outcome (CPC scale at ICU discharge) were compared between patients according to the presumed cardiac or respiratory origin of the cardiac arrest. ResultsTwo hundred and fifty-one cardiac arrest patients were included, 156 from presumed cardiac origin (62%) and 95 from presumed respiratory origin (38%). Patients with presumed cardiac cause presented more frequently a shockable rhythm (68% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), received more defibrillations attempts (2 [1–5] vs. 0 [0-0], <0.001) and needed less adrenaline (3 mg [0–5] vs. 4 mg [2–7], p = 0.01). The arterial lactate concentration on admission was higher in patients with presumed respiratory causes (6.3 mmol/L [4.2–9.8] vs. 3.2 mmol/L [1.6–5.0], p < 0.001). The proportion of patients presenting a favorable outcome was higher in the population with presumed cardiac causes, compared to its respiratory counterpart (42% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). ConclusionsCompared to presumed cardiac origin, a worse outcome and a different mode of death are associated with the presumed respiratory origin, resulting from a greater insult preceding cardiac arrest. The presumed cause of cardiac arrest could be integrated in the multimodal prognostication process.