Comparison of preoperative ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract

Ultrasound has few reports on its application in prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic efficacies of preoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for HCC MVI and compare these two imaging methods for the diagnosis of this condition. The clinical and preoperative ultrasound and MR imaging data of 26 patients with newly diagnosed HCC were collected between October 2020 and October 2021. According to the gold standard (postoperative pathology), the patients were divided into MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups, and the efficacies of ultrasound and MRI in diagnosing HCC MVI and the consistency between the two imaging modalities were analyzed. For the preoperative diagnosis of MVI using ultrasound, the sensitivity was 93.33%, the specificity was 81.82%, and the accuracy was 88.46%. For preoperative MRI, the sensitivity was 66.67%, the specificity was 100%, and the accuracy was 80.77%. In diagnosing MVI, the two methods had significantly different efficacy (P = 0.031). Ultrasound and MRI have high diagnostic efficiency for MVI, but the accuracy of preoperative MRI was lower than that of preoperative ultrasound. These results indicate that ultrasound has a certain guiding significance in the diagnosis of HCC MVI.