Comparison of preoperative diagnostic performance between dual-energy CT, conventional CT, and MRI in endometrial cancer

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the diagnostic performance of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).Material and methodsThis retrospective study analysed 45 EC patients (mean age: 62 years, range: 44–84 years) undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with dual-energy CT (DECT) and MRI between September 2021 and October 2022. Dual-energy CT generated conventional CT (C-CT) and 40 keV VMI. Quantitative analysis compared contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of tumour to myometrium between C-CT and VMI. Qualitative assessment by 5 radiologists compared C-CT, VMI, and MRI for myometrial invasion (MI), cervical invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for each diagnostic parameter.ResultsVirtual monoenergetic imaging showed significantly higher CNR than C-CT (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher sensitivity for MI than C-CT (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and MRI (<i>p</i> = 0.011) but lower specificity than MRI (<i>p</i> = 0.018). C-CT had a higher sensitivity and AUC for cervical invasion than MRI (<i>p</i> = 0.018 and 0.004, respectively).ConclusionsThe study found no significant superiority of MRI over CT across all diagnostic parameters. VMI demonstrated heightened sensitivity for MI, and C-CT showed greater sensitivity and AUC for cervical invasion than MRI. This suggests that combining VMI with C-CT holds promise as a comprehensive preoperative staging tool for EC when MRI cannot be performed.