Abstract

Three variations of partially replicated central composite designs have been compared. Their prediction capabilities with respect to their prediction variances are assessed using variance dispersion graphs in cuboidal region when the axial distance is α = 1. The results show that for n0 = 1, 2, and 3 center points, the replicated star designs have better prediction potentials than the replicated cube designs when interest is in predicting responses in the face-centered cube. The face-centered cube is the second-order central composite design with axial distance, α = 1.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.