Abstract
Comparisons of monthly‐averaged daily cycles of measured and predicted detection rates of meteor signals for a midpath and an endpath meteor link are used to reveal the validity and limitations of published radiant distributions of meteors. A new method is used to aid in determining the validity and limitations of the nonuniform distributions. Discrepancies in the published, predicted, and measured annual variations in the detection rate of meteor signals are investigated. Contrary to recently published information, predicted annual variations in the detection rate of meteor signals that are caused by meteor radiants close to the ecliptic are shown to be comparable to measured results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
