Abstract

Over the last years, massively parallel sequencing has rapidly evolved and has now transitioned into molecular pathology routine laboratories. It is an attractive platform for analysing multiple genes at the same time with very little input material. Therefore, the need for high quality DNA obtained from automated DNA extraction systems has increased, especially to those laboratories which are dealing with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material and high sample throughput. This study evaluated five automated FFPE DNA extraction systems as well as five DNA quantification systems using the three most common techniques, UV spectrophotometry, fluorescent dye-based quantification and quantitative PCR, on 26 FFPE tissue samples. Additionally, the effects on downstream applications were analysed to find the most suitable pre-analytical methods for massively parallel sequencing in routine diagnostics. The results revealed that the Maxwell 16 from Promega (Mannheim, Germany) seems to be the superior system for DNA extraction from FFPE material. The extracts had a 1.3–24.6-fold higher DNA concentration in comparison to the other extraction systems, a higher quality and were most suitable for downstream applications. The comparison of the five quantification methods showed intermethod variations but all methods could be used to estimate the right amount for PCR amplification and for massively parallel sequencing. Interestingly, the best results in massively parallel sequencing were obtained with a DNA input of 15 ng determined by the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). No difference could be detected in mutation analysis based on the results of the quantification methods. These findings emphasise, that it is particularly important to choose the most reliable and constant DNA extraction system, especially when using small biopsies and low elution volumes, and that all common DNA quantification techniques can be used for downstream applications like massively parallel sequencing.

Highlights

  • Formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding (FFPE) is still the method of choice for preserving clinical tumour specimens

  • For the comparison of the five automated DNA extraction systems 10 FFPE tissue samples were extracted with each system (Table S1)

  • The DNA quantity obtained from the BioRobot M48 was the lowest in 9 samples when measured with the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer and in 8 samples when measured with the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding (FFPE) is still the method of choice for preserving clinical tumour specimens. Most molecular pathology routine laboratories perform mutational analysis for the diagnosis of different types of cancer and the evaluation of therapy options on FFPE tissue samples [1]. New methods such as massively parallel (or generation) sequencing are transitioning into molecular pathology laboratories [2,3,4]. The need for high quality FFPE DNA extracts has increased over the last years [5] To those molecular pathology laboratories with a high sample throughput, automated DNA extraction systems are essential. This is the first study comparing different automated DNA extraction systems with FFPE material

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call