Comparison of Pre-eclampsia Screening Algorithms in the First Trimester of Pregnancy Being Used in Thai Nguyen Province.

Abstract

Objective To compare the rates of pregnancies in high-risk groups for preeclampsia recommended for aspirin prophylactic when screened using various common algorithms. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1726 pregnant women from 11 to 13 weeks six days of gestation receiving antenatal care at two hospitals: Thai Nguyen National Hospital and a hospital in Thai Nguyen Province from October 2022 to October 2023. All participants provided consent for the study. We collected maternal characteristics, obstetric history,mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean uterine artery-PI (UtA-PI), and placental growth factor serum (PLGF). Screening performance estimates were calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. All pregnant women in the study had their preeclampsia risk assessed using all three algorithms with two cut-off points.Our data was collected, entered and analyzed using SPSS software 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Categorical data was reported as frequency and percentage. McNemar's test was used for analyzing differences in the sizes of individual groups. Results In our study, the most common high-risk factor identified was the history of preeclampsia, 132 cases (7.6%). According to the NICE guideline, BMI ≥ 35 (kg/m²) is considered a moderate risk factor for preeclampsia. Several risk factors, such as BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² and history of diabetes mellitus type 1, were not present in any participants. Only one pregnant woman had chronic kidney disease (0.06%). Out of the 1726 pregnant women surveyed, the rates of high-risk preeclampsia were as follows: 9.9% (171 cases) based on algorithm 1; 10.8% (187 cases) based on algorithm 2 with a cut-off point > 1/100, 11.8% (203 cases) with a cut-off point > 1/150; 10.3 % (178 cases) based on algorithm 3 with a cut-off point > 1/100, and 11.6% (201 cases) with a cut-off point > 1/150. Among these algorithms, pregnant women in the high-risk preeclampsia group were advised to consider taking low-dose aspirin. Conclusion Screening for pre-eclampsia based on NICE recommendations resulted in a lower number of high-risk pregnant women requiring prophylactic aspirin use compared to other algorithms. This means that some pregnant women at risk of developing preeclampsia are not recommended to use aspirin as a preventive measure. Adding PLGF to the screening strategy will help us get closer to pregnant women who are truly at risk of progressing to preterm preeclampsia.