Abstract

To compare higher order aberrations of aspheric or wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. This was a prospective, randomized study of a myopic LASIK cohort that was subdivided into two groups; 12 eyes were treated with the optimized aspheric transition zone algorithm (OATz group) and 11 eyes were treated with wavefront-guided optimized path difference custom aspheric treatment (OPDCAT group). Corneal asphericity and higher order aberrations root-mean-square were compared between groups before, 1 month, and 3 months after LASIK. Student t test was used to assess differences between groups. P<.05 was considered statistically significant. At 3 months postoperatively, all eyes in both groups had spherical equivalent refraction of +/-0.50 diopters (D). Mean higher order aberration increased by 0.18 microm postoperatively in the OATz group (P<.05) and decreased by 0.04 microm in the OPDCAT group (P=.819). A statistically significant increase in spherical aberration was noted in the OATz group only (P<.05). Asphericity showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups postoperatively (P<.05). There was a greated tendency for increased higher order aberrations in eyes with <0.30 microm of higher order aberrations preoperatively in the OPDCAT group. The reverse tendency was observed in the OATz group. OPDCAT induced minimal changes in spherical aberration due to lower changes in corneal asphericity compared to the OATz group. Eyes with <0.30 microm of higher order aberrations preoperatively are likely better candidates for the OATz algorithm than OPDCAT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.