Comparison of Postoperative complications between Conventional Ferguson’s Hemorrhoidectomy and LigaSureTM Hemorrhoidectomy

Abstract

Abstract Background For symptomatic grade III and IV haemorrhoids, some form of hemorrhoidectomy remains the accepted modality of treatment. The traditional methods like the Milligan-Morgan method and the Ferguson‘s method have been in practice for more than half a century. Recently we acquired the LigaSureTM device. It is an electro-surgical device, which is an improved version of bipolar diathermy, now widely used for hemorrhoidectomy. This study will give a comprehensive overview on differences between conventional Ferguson‘s haemorrhoidectomy and LigaSureTM haemorrhoidectomy focusing on post-operative complications mainly postoperative pain, bleeding and peri-anal fistulae occurrence Objective To compere between closed hemorrhoidectomy, Ferguson‘s method, and LigaSureTM hemorrhoidectomy as regards post-operative pain, bleeding and peri-anal fistula occurrence. Patients and Methods It is a prospective study conducted over 40 patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids, randomly divided into two groups to compare between closed hemorrhoidectomy, Ferguson‘s method, and LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy as regards post-operative pain, bleeding and peri-anal fistula occurrence. Results An overall favorable trend exists toward LigaSureTM hemorrhoidectomy in all parameters of the current study, in another word, the postoperative complications mainly pain, bleeding and peri-anal fistula occurrence was much lesser in the LigaSureTM group. Conclusion LigaSureTM hemorrhoidectomy is a sutureless, hemorrhoidectomy technique dependent on a modified electro- surgical unit to achieve vessel and tissue sealing. It is safe and effective, has less blood loss, postoperative pain, bleeding and perianal fistula occurrence compared to conventional Ferguson‘s hemorrhoidectomy.