Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy between posterior fossa decompression without duraplasty (PFD) and posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) in the surgical management for adult Chiari Ⅰ malformation. Methods: Fifty-seven patients suffered from Chiari malformation type Ⅰ were treated in Department of Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital from August 2008 to October 2013. Twenty-three patients received posterior fossa decompression without duraplasty and the other 34 patients received posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty. The clinical results were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of two different surgical approaches. Results: There was no death or severe neurological dysfunction case in 57 patients of the two groups. Patients undergoing PFD had shorter length of hospital stay[(13.7±3.5) d vs (16.2±4.1) d, P<0.05]and surgical time[(98.7±22.1) min vs (132.3±39.6)min, P<0.05]. Cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and intracranial infection were more common in patients undergoing PFDD[(0/23, 0) vs (8/34, 23.5%), P<0.05]. Clinical improvement was comparable in two groups[(15/23, 65.2%) vs (26/34, 76.5%), P>0.05]at the one-year follow-up. The rate of syrinx regression in patients with Syringomyelia was higher in patients undergoing PFDD[(3/12, 25%) vs (17/22, 77.3%), P<0.05]. Conclusion: For adult patients with Chiari malformation type Ⅰ, PFD has the advantages of simple manipulation, short length of hospital stay and low incidence of cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and intracranial infection, compared with PFDD. It is comparable to PFDD in clinical improvement, but the effect of PFD is not as good as that of PFDD in the aspect of syrinx regression.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call