Comparison of posterior capsule opacification development with 3 intraocular lens types: Five-year prospective study

Abstract

To compare the effects of hydrophobic acrylic, silicone, and heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) (HSM PMMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs) on posterior capsule opacification (PCO). In this 5-year prospective study, the same surgeon performed standard phacoemulsification in patients who were randomized to implantation of a round-edged HSM PMMA IOL (809C), a round-edged silicone IOL (SI-40NB), or a sharp-edged hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof MA60BM). The neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rate was recorded. To evaluate PCO and the position of the anterior capsulorhexis, retroillumination digital photographs were taken 5 years postoperatively and analyzed using the POCOman computer-analysis system. After 5 years, there was no significant difference in the fraction or severity of PCO between the silicone IOLs and acrylic IOLs (both P =1.0). The silicone IOL group had a significantly higher capsulotomy rate (29%) than the acrylic IOL group (8%) (P=.0068). The HSM PMMA IOL group had a significantly higher PCO fraction, severity, and capsulotomy rate (54%) than the silicone and acrylic groups. In all eyes, the fraction (P=.0076) and severity (P=.0081) of PCO were statistically significantly higher when the anterior capsulorhexis was partly decentered than when it was completely on the optic; within each IOL group, there was no significant difference. After 5 years, there was no significant difference in the semiquantitative evaluation of PCO between the sharp-edged acrylic IOL and round-edged silicone IOL. Eyes with the HSM PMMA IOL had more PCO than eyes with the other IOLs.