Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between total thoracoscopic surgery and conventional full-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement

Abstract

BackgroundTo compare the post-operative pain and quality of life of patients who underwent total thoracoscopic surgery (TTS) or conventional full-sternotomy (CFS) for aortic valve replacement (AVR).MethodsWe reviewed the records of 223 consecutive AVR patients with either TTS or CFS from January 2018 to December 2022. We used a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to measure the post-operative pain and quality of life, respectively. We also compared the operative data and clinical outcomes between the two groups.ResultsThe TTS group had lower adjusted mean VAS scores than the CFS group at all time points after surgery (at 1 to 3 days and at 3 and 6 months, p < .001 for all comparisons), indicating less pain. The TTS group also had higher mean SF-36 scores than the CFS group up to 6 months after surgery (p < .001 for all comparisons), indicating better quality of life. The operative time was similar between the two groups (p = .224), but the TTS group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time than the CFS group (p < .001). The TTS group had more pulmonary complications than the CFS group (p = .023). However, there were no significant differences in other major complications or mortality between the two groups.ConclusionsTTS is a safe and effective alternative to CFS for AVR. TTS resulted in less pain and better quality of life, especially in the early recovery period. However, further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.