Comparison of polidocanol foam versus bleomycin polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this research was to retrospectively investigate the difference of safety and efficacy between polidocanol foam and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF) in the treatment of venous malformations (VMs), and provide clinical evidence for the application of BPF for VMs. MethodsPatients with VMs treated with polidocanol foam and BPF were included between July 2018 and July 2020. The VM tissue involvements and symptoms were collected. The treatment outcomes were evaluated by the clinical improvement of symptoms and the degree of devascularization on ultrasound examination or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, and 6 months after the sclerotherapy. Immediate and delayed complications were closely followed and recorded. ResultsA total of 51 patients were included, including 34 females and 17 males with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 5-65 years). The most commonly involved sites were lower extremities (31/60 [51.7%]) and the most common symptom was pain (33/51 [64.7%]). Fifty-four sclerotherapies were performed with a mean of 1.06 ± 0.24 sessions (range, 1-2 sessions) per patient. The reduction percentage of lesion volume in the BPF group was significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (79.4 ± 1.6% vs 55.7 ± 6.1%; P < .001). Patient satisfaction scores in the BPF group were significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (7.2 ± 1.1 vs 5.7 ± 0.8; P < .001). No major complication was observed in either group. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) grade 1 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 7 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group, CIRSE grade 2 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 4 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group; there were no significant differences between the two groups. ConclusionsBPF is a safe and effective sclerosant for VMs, showing better efficacy and similar safety as commonly used mild sclerosants. It could be a promising agent to treat VMs or other slow-flow vascular malformations.