Abstract
This study aimed to compare the performance of flow cytometry methods with plate counting for the enumeration of bacteria, using Bacillus cereus as a model organism. It was found that the cFDA-propidium iodide, CellROX™ Green-propidium iodide, and DiOC2 dye techniques had similar accuracy to plate counting, while the SYTO 24-propidium iodide dye technique was not as accurate. The four dye techniques had comparable precision to plate counting, with the CellROX™ Green-propidium iodide dye having the greatest precision. The consistency of the position and shape of the cell clusters on the flow cytometry plots, and the extent of separation of the cell from background clusters, was greatest with the DiOC2 and CellROX™ Green-propidium iodide dyes. Furthermore, the DiOC2 and CellROX™ Green-propidium iodide dyes performed well, even when a sample was measured containing reconstituted whole milk powder at a 10−1 dilution, without the use of sample preparation to specifically remove the milk constituents prior to measurement. Given gating of only one cell cluster was required to be managed with the DiOC2 dye, to determine the viable number of cells, it was found that the DiOC2 dye had the greatest ease-of-use. Overall, results indicated that the DiOC2 dye is an ideal candidate for the enumeration of viable bacteria in dairy samples on a high-throughput, routine basis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.