Comparison of Placental Pathology Reports From Spontaneous Preterm Births Finalized by General Surgical Pathologists Versus Perinatal Pathologist: A Call to Action.

Abstract

Placental examination, frequently performed by general surgical pathologists, plays an important role in understanding patient outcomes and explaining the underlying mechanisms leading to preterm birth (PTB). This secondary analysis of a larger study recurrent PTB aimed to compare diagnoses between general surgical pathologists (GSP) and a perinatal pathologist (PP) in preterm placentas examined between 2009 and 2018 at a single institution. Pathology diagnoses were coded into 4 categories (acute inflammation [AI], chronic inflammation, fetal vascular malperfusion, maternal vascular malperfusion) based on original reports for the GSP and second review by the single PP. A total of 331 placentas were included, representing placentas finalized by 17 GSPs. The prevalence of all 4 placental diagnostic categories was higher for the PP, and nearly half (49.2%) of placentas finalized by GSP had no diagnostic findings. Agreement was highest for AI at κ=0.50 (weak agreement). However, there was no agreement for maternal vascular malperfusion (κ=0.063), chronic inflammation (κ=0.0026), and fetal vascular malperfusion (κ = -0.018). Chronic basal deciduitis with plasma cells had the highest false-negative rate (missed in 107 cases by GSP). Villous infarction had the highest false-positive rate (overcalled in 28/41 [68%] cases) with the majority of the "infarcts" representing intervillous thrombi. In conclusion, there is no agreement between GSP and PP when assessing placental pathology other than AI, and weak agreement even for AI. These findings are a call to action to implement educational efforts and structural/organizational changes to improve consistency of placental pathology reporting.