Comparison of phrenic nerve injury and its effect on the extrapulmonary vein structures with cryoballoon and hot-balloon ablation systems: considering the lesion created on the superior vena cava as a surrogate marker.

Abstract

Preventing phrenic nerve injury (PNI) during balloon-based ablation is essential. The superior vena cava-right atrial (SVC-RA) junction is located just opposite the balloon position during right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) ablation, and the phrenic nerve runs nearby on the lateral side. We compared the occurrence of PNI between the two balloon-based ablation systems and also the lesions created at the SVC-RA junction, which were expected to represent the effect on extra-PV structures. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA, n = 110) and hot-balloon ablation (HBA, n = 90) were performed in atrial fibrillation patients. High-density maps of the SVC-RA junction were created in 93 patients (CBA = 53, HBA = 40), and the damaged area (< 1.0mV) was determined as an "SVC lesion". CBA had a higher occurrence of transient PNI (7.3% vs 1.1%, p = 0.035), but all recovered during the 6-month follow-up. An apparent SVC lesion was documented in 43% of the patients (40/93), and all patients with PNI had this lesion. CBA created a frequent (CBA vs HBA = 55% vs 28%, p = 0.008) and wider (0.8[0.4-1.7] cm2 vs 0.5[0.3-0.7] cm2, p = 0.005) SVC lesion than HBA. A multivariate analysis revealed that the use of a CBA system was a predictive factor of the occurrence of SVC lesions. CBA had a higher occurrence of transient PNI but not a permanent form. Every patient with PNI had lesions on the SVC-RA junction, and CBA revealed more substantial ablation effects at the SVC-RA junction than HBA. This may be caused by the different characteristics of the two balloon-based ablation systems and their balloon positions.