Comparison of Permeability from NMR and Production Analysis in Carbonate Reservoirs

Abstract

Abstract Several issues come to mind in the pursuit of log-derived permeability. Two of them, often referred to in recent publications, are the accuracy of the parameter and the representative of this permeability. Permeability from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs is often compared to core, wireline formation tester mobility, drillstem test and production data. The variation in vertical and lateral extent of these different measurements can give valuable insight into reservoir behavior. Average matrix permeability can be estimated from wireline NMR measurements while the other methods can more accurately evaluate the directional reservoir permeability as it varies with heterogeneities such as vugs, fractures, maximum horizontal stress and stylolites. Determining matrix permeability in carbonates from NMR data has been considered more difficult than in typical sandstone reservoirs. Recent developments in NMR carbonate analysis have provided insight as to how the permeability estimation from NMR logs can be improved. A method will be presented that overcomes some of the limitations of using NMR permeability in carbonates and will be compared with conventional NMR permeability estimation, core, wireline formation tester and drillstem test analysis in three Middle East carbonate reservoirs.