Abstract
There is a paucity of data regarding the comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for the treatment of paediatric choledochal cysts. Thus, our primary objective was a comparison of early complications namely post-operative bleeding, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction and the need for reoperation in both techniques. Our secondary objectives included a comparison of the meantime for surgery and HJ, conversion of procedure to open, intraoperative blood loss, late complications like cholangitis, stricture and post-operative outcomes like time to start oral feeds and length of post-operative stay. A retrospective data analysis of all children who underwent laparoscopic and robotic choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y HJ from 2008 to 2021 was performed. Ninety patients were classified into Group R (robotic HJ), n = 20 and Group L (laparoscopic HJ), n = 70. Post-operative complications were comparable amongst groups R and L (2 vs 6; p = 1 and 1 vs 2, p = 0.53, respectively). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in group R (54.8 ± 13.5ml vs 64.1 ± 17.3ml; p = 0.0280). The mean time to complete HJ was significantly less in group R (58 ± 12min vs 71 ± 11min; p < 0.001) while the mean time to complete surgery was significantly more in Group R (284 ± 14min vs 195 ± 18min; p < 0.001). Our preliminary research report suggests overall comparable early complications in both groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.