Comparison of perioperative outcomes of selective arterial clipping guided by near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green versus undergoing standard robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

This study employs a meta-analytic approach to investigate the impact of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, with and without near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF-RAPN vs S-RAPN), on patients' perioperative outcomes and postoperative changes in renal function. The authors conducted a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of primary outcomes following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines, and Risk-of-Bias Tool (RoB2). To ensure a thorough search, the authors systematically searched five major databases, including Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, from databases' inception to April 2023. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age ( P =0.19), right side ( P =0.54), BMI ( P =0.39), complexity score ( P =0.89), tumor size ( P =0.88), operating time ( P =0.39), estimated blood loss ( P =0.47), length of stay ( P =0.87), complications ( P =0.20), transfusion ( P =0.36), and positive margins ( P =0.38). However, it is noteworthy that the NIRF-RAPN group exhibited significant reductions in warm ischemia time ( P =0.001), the percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge ( P =0.01) compared to the S-RAPN group. This meta-analysis provides evidence that the group undergoing NIRF-RAPN showed a statistically significant protective effect on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).