Abstract
In this study, Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) derived from parametric and nonparametric methods using 0.25∘ gridded rainfall data from 1901 to 2013 (113 years) generated by India Meteorological Department (IMD) was compared for understanding drought conditions over the Indian region. The parametric SPI was computed using a three-parameter Gamma distribution function, whereas nonparametric SPI was computed using Gringorten, Weibull, and Hazen plotting positions, on a 4-month cumulative rainfall data of June–September (SPI-4) representing the southwest monsoon season. Nonnormality is a major concern if equal-sized intervals are drawn for interpretation, and SPI being a normalized index wherein classes are standard deviations from normal, its impact on drought assessment needs to be understood. Accordingly, in our study, normality tests were performed using the Shapiro-Wilk method on SPI derived from both parametric and nonparametric methods. The SPI showed 100% of grid cells conforming to normality in the case of nonparametric methods, whereas in the case of parametric approach it was only 80%. The remaining 20% of nonnormality in parametric SPI is spread over montane, tropical wet, and semi-arid regions of India. Furthermore, differences in the estimation of dryness are observed in the range of 1.0 to 2.5% between nonparametric and parametric SPI for the drought years considered this study. The quantile analysis on all grid cells for the drought year 2002 showed an important fact that at 0.025 quantile only 2.6% of grid cells are in the extremely dry condition as per parametric SPI, whereas in the case of nonparametric SPI it is 6.9%. For the drought year 1939 in grid cells where normality is not followed in parametric SPI, Cohen’s kappa (κ = 0.15) under extreme dryness category indicates large disagreements between parametric and nonparametric SPI. The temporal analysis of Cohen’s kappa computed for each grid cell over drought years shows that in 22.5% of cases the drought category between nonparametric and parametric SPI is not in perfect agreement. Hence, the nonparametric SPI can better categorize the drought classes, representing well the extent of dryness and normality conditions, it is highly recommended for drought assessment over India.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.