Abstract

"Carbon neutrality" goals have become a topic of growing concern in recent years, but the way students read is already causing a lot of carbon emissions to the environment. This article explores the two ways students use paper books and electronic products to read, and compares the annual carbon emissions of these two ways. The results show that traditional paper reading is more low-carbon and environmentally friendly, and has a wider audience, but the carbon emissions of both methods cannot be underestimated. This paper further explores relevant measures that can be taken to minimize the carbon emissions of reading to the environment, such as companies can find more environmentally friendly alternative materials, the government can appropriately increase recycling prices to promote the recycling of waste paper and electronic products, users can improve own reading habits to improve the utilization of paper and electronics, etc. This paper looks forward to finding better solutions to the massive carbon emissions caused by the use of paper books and electronic products, and hopes to mitigate the environmental hazards associated with the use of paper books and electronic products.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.