Abstract
Palladium-catalyzed CC and CN bond forming reactions of aryl halides continue to be a major focus in catalysis research for the fine chemical industry. Still there exists a significant need for the development of more active and productive palladium catalysts. Although an increasing number of new catalysts is reported, it is often difficult to compare them. Here, we present a more detailed comparison of the catalytic performance of different monocarbenepalladium(0) complexes and various so-called in situ palladium phosphine and carbene catalysts in Suzuki, Kumada, and Buchwald–Hartwig amination reactions. Depending on the type of coupling reaction good to excellent yields of the desired products are obtained in the presence of both carbene- and phosphine-based catalysts. In general, phosphine-based catalysts appear to be more efficient for amination and Suzuki reactions of aryl chlorides. On the other hand, the carbene-based palladium catalysts work well in Kumada couplings of various aryl chlorides.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.