Comparison of Output SINR and Receiver C/N_0 for GNSS Adaptive Antennas

Abstract

Antenna arrays with space-time adaptive processing (STAP) are commonly utilized to allow the reception of signals in harsh interference environments. The primary applications of STAP have been radar and communications systems, where the STAP weights are optimized for output signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR); however, there is increasing demand for STAP in time-of-arrival (TOA) estimation applications, such as global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers. It is understood that TOA estimation performance is primarily dependent on receiver postcorrelation carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> ). In this study, the distinction between SINR and C/N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> is established, and a performance analysis of the common STAP algorithms is performed in the presence of interference. It is demonstrated that output SINR is an inadequate indication of GNSS receiver C/N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> performance. As a result, caution should be used when measuring the relative performance of different STAP algorithms in GNSS applications. Consequently, the present work develops a novel STAP algorithm which maximizes C/N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> . Additionally, the performance of common STAP algorithms is analyzed in the context of this performance bound, and it is demonstrated that, in many cases, their performance is near optimal.