Abstract

Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures (IFF) fixation could be done with short or long Cephalomedullary Nails (CMNs). Nevertheless, despite several studies in the literature, there has been a continued lack of consensus on which design of CMN is better than the other. Hence, the current review aimed to evaluate the evidence about short versus long CMNs for the fixation of IFF. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol for the study was registered to PROSPERO. Four databases, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched. A total of 31 studies with 6 randomized trials (RCTs) and 25 non-randomized studies were included. Demographic data, follow-up period, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted and evaluated from each of the included studies; statistical analysis was done by Review Manager Software version 5.4.1. Fourteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients were included in this review. Long CMNs showed statistically significant lower rates of ipsilateral shaft femur refracture (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14, 2.24, p = 0.007); however, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups for mortality at 30days and within 1year. Statistically significant shorter duration of surgery (MD-17.83 (95% CI -22.03, -13.63, p < 0.05), less intra-operative blood loss (MD -62.65, 95% CI -97.13 to -28.17, p = < 0.05), and lower blood transfusion rates (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62, 0.83, p < 0.05) for short CMNs; no statistically significant difference for the length of hospital stay, implant-related complications, overall complications, re-operation rates, fluoroscopy time, and functional outcome between two groups of CMNs was seen. With shorter operative time, lesser intra-operative blood loss, and lower postoperative transfusion rates for short CMNs, they have certain benefits over longer CMNs. However, more distal shaft femur fractures were seen in the shorter versionof nail, which should be considered before offering these nails to a patient; careful and individualized postoperative weight-bearing protocol could minimize the same. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00915-5.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call