Comparison of Outcomes in High Versus Low Activity Level Patients After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

BackgroundActivity level (AL) recommendations following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remain controversial. Our purpose was to compare implant survivorship of high activity (HA) and low activity (LA) patients after primary TJA. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in implant survivorship based on AL. MethodsThis was a retrospective 1:1 matched cohort study after primary TJA with minimum 5-year follow-up. High activity patients were designated by the University of California and Los Angeles activity-level rating scale score ≥8 and matched to LA patients based on age (±5), sex, and body mass index (±5). There were 396 HA patients (149 knees and 48 hips) who met inclusion criteria. We analyzed revision rates, adverse events, and radiographic lucencies. ResultsCrepitus was the most common adverse events in both HA and LA total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Adverse events were rare in total hip arthroplasty (THA) cohorts. For both THA and TKA patients, the HA cohort did not have increased reoperations or revisions when compared to the LA cohort. No differences were noted in overall radiographic analysis between HA (16.1%) and LA (12.1%) TKA patients (P = .318), and in THA patients, more radiographic problems were noted in LA (P = .004). ConclusionWe found no difference in minimum 5-year postoperative implant survivorship based on AL. This may change AL recommendations after TKA and THA.