Comparison of Oral Psoralen–UV-A With a Portable Tanning Unit at Home vs Hospital-Administered Bath Psoralen–UV-A in Patients With Chronic Hand Eczema

Abstract

To study whether oral psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) with a portable tanning unit at home is as effective as hospital-administered bath PUVA in patients with chronic hand eczema. Open-label randomized controlled trial, with a 10-week treatment period and an 8-week follow-up period. Two university hospital dermatology departments in the Netherlands, specializing in hand eczema. One hundred fifty-eight patients with moderate to severe chronic hand eczema (more than 1 year in duration). Oral PUVA using methoxsalen capsules and a simple portable commercial facial tanning unit, or hospital-administered bath PUVA with trioxsalen. The primary outcome was clinical assessment by a hand eczema score (evaluation of desquamation, erythema, vesiculation, infiltration, fissures, itch, and pain, each on a 4-point scale) after 10 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcome was hand eczema score at 8 weeks of follow-up, after completion of treatment. The tertiary outcome was travel cost and time off work. Both groups showed a comparable and substantial decrease in hand eczema score (meaningful clinical improvement). This decrease was maintained during the follow-up period. Patients treated with oral PUVA at home had lower travel costs and less time off work. Oral PUVA at home has a clinically relevant efficacy, similar to that of hospital-administered bath PUVA. This effect was maintained during an 8-week follow-up period. It resulted in lower travel costs and less time off work.