COMPARISON OF OPEN VERSUS CLOSED REDUCTION AND FIXATION WITH LOCKING PLATES OF SUPRACONDYLAR PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES WITH STABLE PROSTHESES

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe anatomic distal femoral locking plate (DF-LCP) has simplified the management of supracondylar femoral fractures with stable knee prostheses. Osteoporosis and comminution seem manageable, but at times, the construct does not permit early mobilization. Considerable soft tissue stripping during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) may delay union. Biological plating offsets this disadvantage, minimizing morbidity.MaterialsThirty comminuted periprosthetic supracondylar fractures were operated from October 2010 to August 2016. Fifteen (group A) were treated with ORIF, and fifteen (group B) with closed (biological) plating using the anatomical DF-LCP. Post-operatively, standard rehabilitation protocol was followed in all, with hinged-knee-brace supported physiotherapy. Clinico-radiological follow-up was done at 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly (average duration, 30 months), and time to union, complications, failure rates and function were evaluated.ResultsAverage time to union was 4.5 months (range, 3–6 months) in group A, and 3.5 months (range, 2.5–5 months) in group B. Primary bone grafting was done in twelve patients (all group A). At final follow-up, all fractures had healed, and all (but two) patients were walking unsupported, with no pain or deformity, with average knee range of motion (ROM) of 90° (range, 55 to 100°). Two patients had superficial infection (group A), two had knee stiffness (group A), one had shortening of 1.5cm (group B) and one had valgus malalignment of 10 degrees (group B).ConclusionBiological plating in comminuted supracondylar fractures about stable TKA prostheses is an excellent option, may obviate need for bone grafting, and reducing complications.