Abstract

We have compared the performances of the one‐parameter and linearly scaled one‐parameter double‐hybrid density functionals (1DH‐DFs and LS1DH‐DFs) for noncovalent interactions. The only one parameter related to the Hartree–Fock (HF) exchange for each of the tested 1DH‐DFs and LS1DH‐DFs has been fitted with the well‐designed S66 database. The obtained DHDFs are dubbed as 1DH‐PBE‐NC, LS1DH‐PBE‐NC, 1DH‐TPSS‐NC, LS1DH‐TPSS‐NC, 1DH‐PWB95‐NC, and LS1DH‐PWB95‐NC, where “NC” denotes noncovalent interactions. With a specific combination of exchange and correlation functionals, the dependent parameters related to the nonlocal second‐order perturbative energies are nearly identical for the 1DH and LS1DH models. According to our benchmark computations against the S66, S22B, NCCE31, ADIM6, and L7 databases, we suggest that the 1DH‐PWB95‐NC and LS1DH‐PWB95‐NC functionals are much more suitable for evaluating noncovalent interaction energies. Unlike the versatile DHDFs with dispersion corrections for general purpose, our optimized 1DH‐DFs and LS1DH‐DFs only aim at noncovalent interactions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.