Abstract

The purpose was to compare the ocular higher-order aberrations and the visual performance between photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Ocular aberrations and visual performance were measured after PRK in 26 eyes, after LASIK in 39 eyes, and in 29 normal myopic control eyes. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Visual performance was evaluated with grating contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity under full correction with spectacles. The results were that the root mean square (RMS) values of ocular higher-order aberrations after PRK or LASIK were significantly greater than that of normal controls for both 4-mm and 6-mm zones (PRK; 0.22 ± 0.09 and 0.85 ± 0.24µm, LASIK; 0.20 ± 0.06 and 0.82 ± 0.24µm, normal; 0.10 ± 0.03 and 0.33 ± 0.11µm. P < 0.05 between PRK and normal, LASIK and normal, One Way ANOVA on Ranks). There were no significant differences between PRK and LASIK. The ocular higher-order aberrations increased in proportion with the attempted refractive correction by PRK and LASIK. The ocular higherorder aberrations correlated better with grating contrast sensitivity, low contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity than with high contrast visual acuity. There was no difference among normal, PRK and LASIK in all the visual function tests, except between normal and PRK, or between normal and LASIK with letter contrast sensitivity. In conclusion, there was no difference in both ocular higher-order aberrations and visual performance between PRK and LASIK. The result suggests that surgeons can choose refractive procedures according to the corneal conditions or daily activities of patients.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.