Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether post-extubation respiratory support via nsNIPPV decreases the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).Methods: In this randomized, controlled, open, prospective, single-center clinical trial, we randomly assigned preterm ventilated infants with RDS to either nsNIPPV or NCPAP after extubation. The primary outcome, extubation failure, was defined by pre-specified failure criteria in the 72 hours after extubation.Results: A total of 63 preterm ventilated infants were randomized to receive either nsNIPPV (n = 31) or NCPAP (n = 32). Extubation failure occurred in six (19.3%) of nsNIPPV group compared with nine (28.12%) of NCPAP group and was statistically not significant (p = 0.55). The duration of NIV was significantly lower in nsNIPPV group as compared to NCPAP group (40.4 ± 39.3 hours versus 111.8 ± 116.4 hours, p = 0.003). The duration of supplementary oxygen was significantly lower in nsNIPPV versus NCPAP group (84.9 ± 92.1 hours versus 190.1 ± 140.5 hours, p = 0.002). The rates of BPD in nsNIPPV group (2/29, 6.9%) were significantly lower than in NCPAP group (9/28, 32.14%) (p = 0.02).Conclusions: Compared to NCPAP, nsNIPPV appears to be a feasible mode of extubation in preterm infants with significant beneficial effects of reduced duration of NIV support, supplementary oxygen and decreased rates of BPD.