Abstract

In the Review of February 1981 the NIESR Model (hereafter NM) errors for 1972-80 for GDP and inflation were juxtaposed with the Liverpool Model (hereafter LM) errors reported in Minford (1980a) and other references. It was stated that this was a ‘direct comparison’. It was also stated that my comparison of the LM errors with the actual forecast errors made by NIESR ‘was not a proper one’. The object of this note is (a) to deny the first statement and (b) with respect to the second, clarify the sense in which my comparison (Minford 1980a) was indeed proper.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.