Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Nephroangiotomography (NATG), intravenous subtraction angiography (ISA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were compared with regard to their specificity and diagnostic value, their expenditure of time, equipment and staff as well as to their risk for the patients. The interpretation of NATG is inferior to ISA. The hitting quota of ISA and DSA is equal. The expenditure of time and staff for ISA is important, whereas the equipment for DSA is considerable; however, it has a wider use. In case of a low patient number, ISA delivers sufficient results in the diagnosis of renal hypertension with the advantage that it can also be performed in smaller radiological institutes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
