Comparison of neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery or chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare quality of life (Qol) of patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery (NTS) or standard chemoradiation (CRT). MethodsPatients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer during 2006–2012 were treated with NTS or CRT and were invited to participate. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx) Questionnaire was used to assess patient Qol. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with Qol. ResultsIn total, 90 (78.3%) out of 115 eligible patients completed the questionnaires. No significant differences were found in Qol between treatment groups, except that patients after NTS reported higher scores in the social/family well-being (e.g. satisfaction with sexual life, close relationships with partner or friends, and support from friends) than those after CRT, in particular, during 2–3 years after treatment. Results of multivariate analysis indicated that NTS was associated with better social/family functioning, while advanced stage of cervical cancer, lower family income and lower education were associated with impaired Qol in different domains. ConclusionsAlthough self-reported Qol after treatment were not significantly different, NTS treated patients reported better social/family functioning than CRT treated patients, such as satisfaction with their sexual life and close relationships with partner or friends, during 2–3 years post treatment. These results were helpful for physicians to make treatment decisions while considering treatment-related Qol, and moreover, for rehabilitation and supportive care of patients after treatment. Further validation of our findings in randomized, controlled clinical trials is warranted.