Abstract
BackgroundThe aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam for sedative premedication administered by nebuliser 30 min before general anaesthesia in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy and aspiration. MethodsNinety children aged 3–7 yr were randomly allocated into three equal groups to be premedicated with either nebulised ketamine 2 mg kg−1 (Group K), dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg−1 (Group D), or midazolam 0.2 mg kg−1 (Group M). The primary endpoint was a five-point sedation score on arrival in the operating room 30 min after end of study drug administration. Secondary outcomes included: parental separation anxiety scale; medication and mask acceptance scales; haemodynamic variables; recovery time; postoperative face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale; emergence agitation scale; and adverse effects. ResultsThe median (range) sedation score on arrival in the operating room was 3.5 (1–4), 2.0 (2–3) and 2.0 (1–3) in Groups M, D, and K, respectively (P=0.000). Subjects in Group D showed higher medication (P<0.03) and mask acceptance scores (P<0.015) and more satisfactory parental separation anxiety scale (P<0.044). The median (range) recovery time was significantly shorter in Group D [5.5 (4–8) min] compared with Group K [10.0 (5–15) min, P=0.000] and M [8.0 (6–15) min, P=0.000]. The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in Group D (P<0.008). ConclusionsPreschool children premedicated with nebulised dexmedetomidine had more satisfactory sedation, shorter recovery time, and less postoperative agitation than those who received nebulised ketamine or midazolam. Clinical trial registrationNCT02935959.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.