Comparison of nanoemulsion and non-emollient artificial tears on tear lipid layer thickness and symptoms

Abstract

PurposeDry eye disease (DED) is often managed with over-the-counter eye drops. This study evaluated the diurnal effects of a single drop of two ocular lubricants (nanoemulsion vs. non-emollient) on tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT) and symptoms of ocular dryness. Subjects were also assessed after 1 month of nanoemulsion eye drop use. MethodsPart 1 was a cross-over comparison of a nanoemulsion and a non-emollient eye drop. LLT and dry eye symptoms were measured at baseline and at 15min, 1h, 2h, 4h and 6h after instillation of each drop. Part 2 was a 1-month observational study assessing LLT and symptoms after 30-day use of the nanoemulsion drop four times daily (qid). ResultsTotal of 20 subjects completed the study (mean age=45.6±7.9, 15 female). Part 1 found a significant increase in average LLT 15min after nanoemulsion drop instillation in the overall and inferior third of the tear film for subjects with baseline LLT values <50nm. Average LLT values did not increase after use of the non-emollient. Symptoms of dryness improved up to 6h following instillation of both drops. Part 2 results found that using the nanoemulsion eye drop for 1 month improved symptoms reported on symptom surveys. ConclusionNanoemulsion eye drop use increased average LLT in subjects with low baseline levels. Statistically and clinically significant improvement in symptoms were found on symptom surveys after qid-use (four times a day) of the nanoemulsion drop. Results suggest that a nanoemulsion eye drop can benefit subjects with dry eye symptoms.