Comparison of myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass to standard open heart technique in patients with left ventricular dysfunction1

Abstract

To compare myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass to standard open heart technique in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. 117 patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction (EF) < 35%) underwent coronary artery bypass surgery between January 1991 and July 1994. Sixty-four (group A) were operated on without a cardiopulmonary bypass, and 53 (group B) with one. Prevalence of EF < 20% (17 vs. 6%) and emergency operations (22 vs. 7%, P = 0.03) was higher in group A. The average number of grafts was 1.9 +/- 0.8/pt in group A and 3.5 +/- 0.9/pt in group B (P < 0.01), and the internal mammary artery was used in 54 (84%) and 42 (79%) patients, respectively. Only 16 patients (25%) in group A received a graft to a circumflex marginal artery compared to 51 (96%) in group B (P < 0.0001). Two patients (3.1%) died perioperatively in group A compared to 7 (13%) in group B (P = NS). In two patients from group A (3.1%) and in four (7.5%) from group B intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted postoperatively (P = NS). One year actuarial survival was 91 and 79% (P = 0.03) and 2-year survival was 86 and 65% (P = 0.04), respectively. Return of angina occurred in five (8%) and three (6%) patients (P = NS). These results show a trend for lower operative risk resulting in better overall survival in selected patients with LV dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.