Comparison of MUSE-DWI and conventional DWI in the application of invasive breast cancer and malignancy grade prediction: A comparative study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare MUSE-DWI with conventional DWI in assessing lesions of invasive breast cancer and evaluating the ADC values for preoperative histological grading. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 63 lesions confirmed as invasive breast cancer by surgical or biopsy pathology. Preoperatively, all patients underwent MUSE-DWI, conventional DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) scans. Two radiologists with over 5 years of experience (intermediate and senior levels, respectively) subjectively evaluated the images for clarity, image artifacts, and distortion. Objective evaluation included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of lesions and fibrous tissue, as well as the ADC values of both imaging techniques. Due to the limited number of cases classified as grade I and the insignificant difference in disease-specific survival and recurrence scores between grades I and II tumors, grades I and II were grouped as low-grade, while grade III was classified as high-grade. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the efficacy of ADC values in preoperatively predicting the grading of invasive breast cancer. ResultsThe SNR and subjective quality scores of MUSE-DWI images were significantly higher than those of conventional DWI (p < 0.05). For the same case, the ADC values of MUSE-DWI were lower than those of conventional DWI. The AUC values for predicting the grading of invasive breast cancer were 0.849 for MUSE-DWI and 0.801 for conventional DWI. ConclusionCompared to conventional DWI, MUSE-DWI significantly reduces artifacts and distortions, greatly improving image quality. Moreover, MUSE-DWI demonstrates higher diagnostic efficacy for preoperative histological grading of invasive breast cancer.