Comparison of Modified Kessler and McLarney Techniques in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.

Abstract

IntroductionHand injuries are common in the routine practice of any upper limb surgeon. The laceration of the flexor tendons can engage the functional prognosis of the hand. Hence, there exist a multitude pf suturing techniques whose goal is to have a solid repair, allowing an early rehabilitation. Our study aims at comparing the functional results after flexor tendon repairs in zone II using two different techniques, modified Kessler technique and McLarney technique.MethodsOur study included 42 patients, divided into two groups, one having benefited from the modified Kessler technique and the other from the McLarney technique. The modified Strickland classification was used to compare the functional results at six months after surgery of the two techniques.ResultsOur study showed a better post-operative functional outcome with a lower risk of post-operative rupture in patients operated with the McLarney four-strand technique compared to patients operated with the modified Kessler two-strand technique.ConclusionHand wounds in zone II remain a therapeutic challenge for any orthopedic surgeon due to the multiplicity of factors involved in the prognosis, in particular the type of suture. The suture with more than two strands has proven its effectiveness and its reproducibility, making it possible to find the balance sought by the surgeon, namely a suture that is not cumbersome, easy and quick to perform, and strong enough to start early rehabilitation.