Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study reports a comparison between Fe-based corrosion products immobilised by direct vitrification through furnace melting versus microwave melting. Although microwave melting is faster, the Fe-corrosion product does not dissolve in the melt and is encapsulated by the vitreous phase. In comparison, for furnace melting, complete dissolution of the corrosion product in the glass is obtained till the solubility limits are exceeded. In both cases, Fe release is low indicating that either strategy may be employed for immobilisation depending upon the species captured in the Fe-corrosion product.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
