Comparison of Microbial Removal Between Slow Dead-End Versus Tangential Sand Filtration.

Abstract

Both river bank filtration and dead-end sand filtration are becoming increasingly applied in rural areas to improve the quality of fecally contaminated water. To evaluate the capacity of both treatments to remove E. coli, fecal streptococci, and somatic and K13-phages, this study investigates their concentrations in diluted wastewater after short-distance tangential sand filtration and dead-end sand filtration. Bacteria were almost undetectable in both systems after 60 cm depth, and at a pore-water velocity of 1 m/d. Both phages underwent removal of 2.5 logs by tangential filtration, whereas dead-end filtration removed 5.1 logs and 3.9 logs of K13-phages and somatic phages, respectively. After discounting removal by the schmutzdecke, observed only in the dead-end filtration, both systems removed phages similarly. It is concluded that short-distance river bank filtration, alone, does not meet WHO requirements for drinking water. However, the concomitant reduction of suspended solids renders the filtered water amenable to further treatment steps.