Comparison of methods for determination the bearing capacity of piles in punched holes with broadening using the results of static load tests

Abstract

In recent years, due to the increasing of urban construction extent, there has been a tendency to exhaust of territorial reserves, suitable for construction in large cities. Increasingly, it is necessary to use territories with unfavorable soil conditions for the construction of civil and industrial buildings. In such cases, various pile foundations are used, which have significant technical and economic advantages compared to foundations on a natural bases. Among the progressive designs of pile foundations, a special place is occupied by piles in punched holes with broadening (SPSu), which ensure the improvement of the physical and mechanical properties of the foundation during the production of works, as well as the reduction of material, energy and labor costs during their installation. Piles of this type are designed using the developed regulatory framework ISO 36554501-018-2009 "Design and installation of pile foundations and reinforced foundations from packed piles in punched holes". At the same time, the task of improving the quality of work on the design, arrangement, as well as the assessment and prediction of the bearing capacity of piles becomes particularly relevant. This task is solved with a high degree of accuracy by conducting large-scale tests of piles with a static load tests. These tests are carried out in real conditions of the construction site and allow to observe the changes pile`s settlement under load. The article is devoted to solving the problem of increasing the efficiency of assessing the bearing capacity of piles according to static load tests. Using the example of the test results of single SPSu, the authors of the article assess the effectiveness of the existing domestic and foreign methods for determining the bearing capacity of piles. As part of the solution of this issue, the results of the bearing capacity determining according to SP 24.13330.2021 were compared with the data obtained during the use of Davisson, Chin, De Beer, Hansen, Decourt and Eurocode 7 methods. The advantages and disadvantages of this approaches used are noted. Based on the accumulated practical experience of testing the SPSu in various ground conditions, the authors of the article proposed an alternative method of interpreting the "settlement - load" graph.