Abstract

Validity of five models suggested for expressing the relationship between vapour pressures and GC retention times measured on a non-polar capillary column were tested on a common set of compounds [five homologous series of the type H–(CH 2) n –Y, where Y denotes Cl, Br, CHO, OCOCH 3 and COOCH 3, and n varies from 6 to 14]. Standard methods of statistical analysis, as well as vapour pressure values obtained independently from direct vapour pressure measurements were used as validity criteria. For the 40-compound data set examined, the methods provided vapour pressures agreeing within 9.2–24.7% (average absolute percent error) with direct experimental data.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.