Abstract

We have compared the abilities of intraluminal strain gauges and manometry to record motor activity from the antrum and duodenum of the anesthetized dog. Responses to intraarterial carbachol, vagal stimulation, and field stimulation recorded by these devices were compared to those registered by strain gauges sewn onto the overlying serosa. In the antrum, the perfused tube (PT) recorded 98% and 97% of field- and vagal-stimulated phasic contractions, respectively, compared with 83% and 90% (p < 0.005) registered by the intraluminal tubemounted strain gauges (TSGs). In contrast, in the duodenum there was no difference between the accuracy of these devices in recording phasic activity induced by field stimulation (PT 90% and TSG 87%). Similarly, there was no difference between the abilities of these devices to record tonic contraction induced by carbachol in the antrum (PT 87% and TSG 90%) or duodenum (PT 82% and TSG 87%). However, TSGs misrepresented the configuration of phasic or tonic contractions, producing bifid, negative, or biphasic contractions substantially more frequently than did PT (p < 0.005). These results illustrate that the accuracy of these two commonly used techniques may be influenced by anatomic factors as well as by the type of contraction recorded.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.