Abstract
Measurements of surface pressures and response on the CAARC standard tall building model, made at six establishments, have been compared. In general, the degree of agreement was good and mostly within the scatter of reasonable experiemental accuracy. Small trends were observable in respect of pressure measurements which could be attributed to differences in the approaching longitudinal velocity spectrum and to the requirement for blockage corrections. There were no obvious trends in the dynamic response measurements where the majority of the data compared within ±15%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
