Abstract
Small area estimates have received much attention from both private and public sectors due to the growing demand for effective planning of health services, apportioning of government funds and policy and decision making. The uncertainty of empirical best linear unbiased predictor (EBLUP) estimates is widely assessed by mean squared error (MSE). MSEs are criticized as they are not area specific since they do not depend on the direct estimators from the survey. In this paper, we compare the performances of different MSE estimators with respect to the relative bias and relative risk using a Monte Carlo simulation study. Simulation results suggest the superiority of the proposed MSEs over the existing methods in some situations. As a case study, the 2010/11 household consumption expenditure survey (HCES) and the 2007 housing and population census of Ethiopia have been used to study the performances of the MSE estimators.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
