Abstract
The anaerobic threshold is a physiologic event studied in various species. There are various methods for its assessment, recognized in the human and equine exercise physiology literature, several of these involving the relationship between blood lactate concentration (LAC) and exercise load, measured in a standardized exercise test. The aim of this study was to compare four of these methods: V2, V4, individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) and lactate minimum speed (LMS) with the method recognized as the gold standard for the assessment of anaerobic threshold, maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS). The five tests were carried out in thirteen trained Arabian horses, in which velocities and associated LAC could be measured. The mean velocities and the LAC associated with the anaerobic threshold for the five methods were respectively: V2 = 9.67±0.54; V4 = 10.98±0.47; V IAT = 9.81±0.72; V LMS = 7.50±0.57 and V MLSS = 6.14±0.45m.s-1 and LAC IAT = 2.17±0.93; LAC LMS = 1.17±0.62 and LAC MLSS = 0.84±0.21mmol.L-1. None of the velocities were statistically equivalent to V MLSS (P<0.05). V2, V4 and V LMS showed a good correlation with V MLSS , respectively: r = 0.74; r = 0.78 and r = 0.83, and V IAT did not significantly correlate with V MLSS. Concordance between the protocols was relatively poor, i.e., 3.28±1.00, 4.84±0.30 and 1.43±0.32m.s-1 in terms of bias and 95% agreement limits for V2, V4 and LMS methods when compared to MLSS. Only LAC LMS did not differ statistically from LAC MLSS. Various authors have reported the possibility of the assessment of anaerobic threshold using rapid protocols such as V4 and LMS for humans and horses. This study corroborates the use of these tests, but reveals that adjustments in the protocols are necessary to obtain a better concordance between the tests and the MLSS.
Highlights
The anaerobic threshold (AT), a metabolic event associated with the increase in lactacidemia and changes in breathing, was theorized for humans and has been discussed at length for a number of decades in sport sciences (Aunola and Rusko, 1992; Myers and Ashley, 1997; Faude et al, 2009)
The aim of this study was to compare the methods of assessing the anaerobic threshold based on lactacidemia, V2, V4, individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) and lactate minimum speed (LMS) with the maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS) method, which is considered the gold standard, in Arabian horses during a standardized exercise test performed on a high-speed treadmill
These findings corroborate the laboratory finding of the above mentioned study, in which horses thet exercised at intensities corresponding to V2 on the treadmill were incapable of maintaining their lactacidemia without a variation of more than 1 mmol.L-1 between the 14th and 18th min of the constant intensity test, indicating that this intensity is greater than MLSS
Summary
The anaerobic threshold (AT), a metabolic event associated with the increase in lactacidemia and changes in breathing, was theorized for humans and has been discussed at length for a number of decades in sport sciences (Aunola and Rusko, 1992; Myers and Ashley, 1997; Faude et al, 2009) The assessment of this threshold, by means of the quantification of some metabolic variables, lactacidemia, has been utilized for athletic horses (Bas et al, 2000; Rogers et al, 2007; Lindner et al, 2009; Lindner, 2010). The aim of this study was to compare the methods of assessing the anaerobic threshold based on lactacidemia, V2, V4, IAT and LMS with the MLSS method, which is considered the gold standard, in Arabian horses during a standardized exercise test performed on a high-speed treadmill
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
